<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Neurodiversity on wyrd</title><link>https://wyrd.im/tags/neurodiversity/</link><description>Recent content in Neurodiversity on wyrd</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-ie</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://wyrd.im/tags/neurodiversity/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>staying curious as a first principle</title><link>https://wyrd.im/posts/staying-curious-as-a-first-principle/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://wyrd.im/posts/staying-curious-as-a-first-principle/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>for the easter egg bunnies out there, the footnotes&lt;sup id="fnref:1">&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1&lt;/a>&lt;/sup> are sidequests to feed your own monotropic wyrmholes. choose your own adventures, and enjoy!&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="blather">blather&lt;/h2>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Over-optimisation is the &lt;em>feng shui&lt;/em> of systems architecture
&amp;mdash; some fool, some time ago&lt;/p>&lt;/blockquote>
&lt;p>&amp;hellip;or someone the early stages of a deeper understanding of their process? That depends on your chosen lens.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Mine says: why not both?&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="the-happiest-accidents">the happiest accidents&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>I have come to realise that most of my smart optimisations are stumbled upon, and developed, often unconsciously, sometimes for decades before I can surface a notion, let alone a deep understanding of why the fuck I do what I do.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>